Thursday, October 9, 2008

Compact fluorescent bulbs cause skin reddening (and other illnesses)

Hi All
In this story the Health Protection Agency (Great Britain) has managed to discover a simple problem with compact fluorescent bulbs, but they have failed to find the real danger. Most of these bulbs produce high frequency radiation which travels around household electrical systems and causes radiation throughout homes (and other premises). Several of these bulbs being used in homes have been known to cause severe health problems, for those exposed to the radiation. The HPA needs to look at Canadian and US research (Havas and Stetzer) which clearly shows the dangers that they have missed.
Maybe they should change their name to Half, Quarter or Partial, HPA. It would seem that they are not very good at what they are supposed to do, protecting the public. There are many electro sensitive victims who would be able to explain how dangerous these CFBs are.
UV light fear over 'green' bulbs

Being too close to energy-saving light bulbs could cause skin reddening because of ultraviolet light emissions, health experts have warned.

The Health Protection Agency (HPA) cautions against being closer than 30cm (1ft) to some compact fluorescent (cfl) bulbs for long.

But it added there is no evidence that such bulbs pose a cancer threat.

Enclosed CFL lights - where the coil is covered like a traditional bulb - are safer, it advised.

The agency says that UV light equivalent to being outside on a sunny day is being emitted by some bulbs, but if the coil is not visible the issue is prevented.

The HPA said it was prompted to investigate the bulbs after being approached by groups representing people who suffer from light sensitivity issues.

'Precautionary advice'

As a result of testing which revealed the potentially high levels of UV light, the HPA has issued guidelines against people using unencapsulated light bulbs - where the light coil is visible - closer than 30cms to the body for more than one hour a day.

However, the agency stressed families should not remove energy-saving light bulbs from their homes, adding that there was no risk of skin cancer.

"We are not saying these could cause cancer," said HPA chief executive Justin McCracken said.

"At the exposure levels we are talking about the worst effect that we believe there is as result of our investigation is that people could have some short-time reddening of their skin."

Manufacturing issue

The HPA's experts are thought to be the first in the world to spot the problem and they have called on the EU, manufacturers and the bodies which set standards related to the bulbs, to work on tightening the rules around their creation and use.

No one manufacturer was singled out by the research which is due to be published in an academic journal.

About one in five unencapsulated bulbs was found to have UV radiation emissions from a pool of 20 encapsulated and 53 unencapsulated which were tested.

Dr John O'Hagan, group leader of the HPA's Radiation Protection Division, said his research had suggested the problem may be caused by issues such as phosphor, bends in the glass or the quality of the glass.

Professor Harry Moseley, Consultant Clinical Scientist at the University of Dundee, said: "We are concerned about risks to patients who have severe light-sensitive skin disorders.

"The small levels of ultra-violet emitted by some low energy light bulbs could be harmful to these patients. I recommend use of lights with a protective shield to absorb the UV."

Experts stress that healthy people are at no risk providing the HPAs advice is followed.

Industry group the Lighting Association worked with the HPA on the results of this study and has commissioned further independent research into the claims, although it did welcome the precautionary advice issued.