| Aug 28, 2010: To: Nina Arron, Director of Public Health Protection and Prevention Tony Amalfa, Manager Environmental Health Programs Gloria Rachamin, Toxicologist, Dept of Public Health Protection and Prevention Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. cc. Vivek Goel, Heather Manson, Brian Schwartz, Samir Khalil, Ontario Agency for Health Promotion and Prevention. Further to our conversation in your offices on Aug 24, 2010 when you met with myself, Barrie Trower, Magda Havas and Patricia Naylor, and specifically regarding the Chief medical Officer of Health Arlene King's public statement that "wireless communications systems do not pose a public health risk":
Regarding my comment in our meeting that this statement is false, I am attaching a document to verify this. It is a review of the health risks associated with wireless communications devices from The Royal Society of Canada. It was commissioned by Health Canada in 1999, and it will inform you that the opposite of Dr. King's statement is true.
This document from the highest scientific authority in our country clearly outlines that biological effects and health effects do occur from microwave radiation used by "wireless communication devices" including the specific frequencies transmitted by our school WiFi devices, and at well below the established "safe" guidelines printed by Health Canada in Safety Code 6, based on the thermal effect.
Specifically, the Royal Society of Canada concludes that well below thermal effects the microwaves used by WiFi devices can compromise the integrity of the blood-brain barrier (Sect 6.6 pg 44).
It also concludes that microwave radiation from wireless communication devices at intensities below health Canada's Guidelines can activate ODC salivary enzymes known to promote cancer in humans. (Sect 6.3.3 pg 41-42)
It concludes that microwaves at these frequencies and below Health Canada's Guidelines disrupt calcium regulation. (Sect 6.2 pg 35)
It also concludes that there is "strong evidence that microwave irradiation produces behavioural and associated biochemical changes at or below the occupational exposure limits in SC6". (Sect 6.7 pg 46)
We want to ensure that we are quoting "the right information" and we believe the Royal Society of Canada, in an expert panel report to Health Canada is an irrefutable source on the subject in this country. It cites 468 peer reviewed studies, scientific reports and high court rulings. We believe you will consider this to be sufficient "weight of evidence" to stand by the Royal Society's conclusion that exposure to microwaves can indeed change physical biology at frequencies transmitted using WiFi devices, at levels below health Canada's limits. And that it is currently unknown whether this is safe.
The Royal Society's conclusions strongly suggest that blanketing an entire school system with constant exposure is an application that will predictably pose a public health "risk", especially among children. This is because scientific consensus declares that children are among the most vulnerable to microwave radiation (ICNIRP General Approach to Protection against Non-Ionizing Radiation, pg 546).
Microwave exposure limits in Health Canada's Safety Code 6 as you know are based on heating the skin of a grown man after 6 minutes of exposure to microwaves, not changing the biological function of a 4 year old girl after microwave exposure for 6 hours per day, five days per week over fourteen years. These limits have not been scientifically set, there is no consensus that this is safe, and therefore statements regarding their safety are without foundation.
No study has been conducted to determine whether these proven biological changes are expressing in health effects. It would contravene accepted criteria of scientific ethics to expose children to harmful agents such as microwaves from Wifi in order to prove harm or no harm. Yet that is exactly what we are doing in schools without any notification or informed consent.
We have observed heart irregularities and other symptoms requiring emergency room treatment. We have reported this to our school Board, the public health unit of Simcoe Muskoka District, the provincial Ministers of Health and Education, and the Federal Ministers of Health and Industry. To date we have been dismissed by all despite the scientifically accepted evidence that biological changes do occur from the microwave exposure to which our children are being subjected daily.
Furthermore, in response to Dr. King`s statement that the local health unit is unaware of this, I am attaching correspondence dating back to May of 2010 when I provided detailed information about the problem and requested an investigation. You are advised that the statement that "they are not aware of any illness in the community that could be traced back to the use of wireless systems in the schools," is also false. An accurate statement would be "The local health unit has received a report of a suspected illness cluster that parents believe is associated with microwave exposure from a WiFi system in their children's school. The local health unit has dismissed the complaint without investigating."
Finally, I suggest that after you and your staff confirm the above information that you urgently recommend Dr. King issue a new statement based on this critical information, such as:
"Microwaves used in current WiFi technology are shown to produce biological, medical and behavioural changes. These changes can occur at levels much lower than Health Canada's current protection guidelines. Exposure to such microwave radiation from WiFi devices should be avoided, especially for children and pregnant women, until further testing can prove it to be safe."
I strongly request this statement be widely publicized before school starts on Sept 7th of this year.
Sincerely, Rodney Palmer Simcoe County Safe School Committee
| 
