The Canadian initiative to stop Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution
25 December 2013
The Canadian initiative to stop Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution
25 December 2013
The Canadian initiative to stop Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution
19 December 2013
Prithvijit Mitra,TNN | 
KOLKATA: It has always been feared and debated; now, a   study has reinforced the belief that radiation from cellphone   towers are taking a toll on the health of people living near   them.
Cellphone tower radiation could be   triggering a range of disorders - from fatigue, memory loss, headaches and   hearing impairment to more serious problems like cardiac diseases and even congenital defects, claims the study conducted by   researchers of the Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research   Institute (NSCRI).
It has always been feared and debated. Now, a   health impact study reinforces it. Cell phone towers   in Kolkata have been taking a heavy toll on the health of people living close to   them. It could be triggering a range of disorders from fatigue, memory loss,   headache and hearing impairment to more serious ones   like cardiac problems and even congenital defects, claims the study conducted by   researchers of the Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute   (NSCRI).
Continued exposure to electromagnetic waves from cellphone   towers could even cause cancer, the study warns. Researchers from the institute   studied and observed 200 people residing in areas with a high density of   cellphone towers in central Kolkata. While some lived in buildings that had   towers on the roof, others live within 50 metres of such   buildings.
Almost everyone said they had been experiencing some form of   physical discomfort.
Around 70% suffered from fatigue; 30% had partial   loss of memory; 20% had dizziness and 25% had sleeping disorders. While 20% had   skin infections, around 12-15% had hearing impairment and 10% suffered from   cardiac problems. Almost half of those surveyed said they had difficulty in   concentrating and 30% said they were irritable. Two babies - each born in the   last six months - had congenital defects, the study found.
Even though   the study does not directly correlate the disorders (see box) to the cellphone   towers, it points out that the complaints were restricted to a 50-metre radius   of the towers.
"Interestingly, most of the subjects of the study said the   intensity of their ailments goes down once they leave their homes and reverts to   the earlier stage once they return," said Ashish Mukhopadhyay of NSCRI. "While we need further evidence, this is   indeed something that technical experts should worry about," he   added.
Electromagnetic waves emitted from towers could cause cell damage,   leading to cancer, Mukhopadhyay said. "Continued exposure to such waves could   cause cell damage, leading to cancer. It could also trigger cardiac disorders,"   he added.
The radio frequency (RF) standard that the cellphone industry   had adopted prior to 
"We already have level I evidence to prove that   those who live near towers and are exposed to this radiation 24 hours a day are   not safe. It is quite possible for them to suffer from disorders, especially   hearing impairment, visual problems and loss of memory. There is as yet no   direct evidence to show that tower radiation causes cancer. But we need more   studies to check whether brain tumours are related to this," said Jaydip Biswas,   director, Chittaranjan National Cancer Research Institute (CNCRI). Biswas added   that even without such evidence, towers should not be allowed in congested   neighbourhoods and near schools.
Oncologist Gautam Mukhopadhyay said: "Continued exposure to electromagnetic waves has   got to have an impact. Even if it doesn't trigger brain tumours, it could well   be causing a host of other ailments. These could snowball into a major   disorder," he added.
In Kolkata, most cell sites emit radiation of nearly   100 Watts per square metre. The government argues it has adopted the guideline   of 9.2 Watt/sq m set by International Convention for Non-Ionizing Radiation   Protection as a safe limit. What it does not mention is that the norm is for   exposure to radiation for 6 minutes a day.
IIT-Kharagpur professor Sudarshan Neogi, who co-authored a pilot study on   cellphone radiation, commissioned by the state government, believes the   prescribed limit - 0.92 Watts per square metre - is faulty. "For every 6-minute   exposure, there is a 23hour 54minute cooling period. This does not happen in   areas with a high concentration of towers. So, health hazards are a possibility.   But our hands are tied till we can prove that the standard is indeed faulty,"   Neogi said.
Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI)   director-general Rajan Mathews argued that the radiation levels were within prescribed   limits and have not yet been proved harmful. "The existing limit in   
Iris
Smart meter rings alarm bells & more
Maisch documents a number of case studies from smart meter users in Melbourne in which individuals are complaining of nausea, heart palpitations, headaches and shortness of breath.
There is, Maisch argues, "practically no research on possible ill health effects of exposure to smart meter radio frequency emissions".
This is despite a US survey of smart meter users showing that 49 per cent experienced insomnia, 43 per cent stress, 40 per cent headaches, 38 per cent ringing in the ears and 26 per cent heart problems.
Smart Meter Resolution 315 Passes In Ulster County, New York
Cancer's lost generation: the teens and young adults
Hundreds gather in Tsawwassen to oppose U.S. radio towers
Opponents, including guest speaker Milt Bowling, expressed a myriad of concerns, including potential health impacts as well as interference with frequencies and electronic equipment, issues they say made the towers hugely unpopular in Ferndale. They also note there was no public notification on this side of the border by either the FCC or the applicant.
Tell the FCC to reject the Pirate "Border Blaster" in Washington State
"The responsibility of any institution includes ensuring the safety of the public, and a board of education is no different," Barnett said. "In fact, it is bound to protect children as part of its mandate."
Kim Horsevad, the students' biology   teacher at Hjallerup School, said: 'This has sparked quite a lively debate in   Denmark regarding the potential adverse health   effects from mobile phones and wifi equipment.' 
The results will bolster the findings of researchers in Holland, who found that trees exposed to wireless radio signals suffered from damaged bark and dying leaves.
To sign up for WEEP News: newssignup@weepinitiative.org (provide name and e-mail address)
W.E.E.P.  The Canadian initiative to stop: Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution
The Canadian initiative to stop Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution
15 December 2013
Jury awards Vermont family $1M for transmission tower
The Vermont Electric Power Company has been ordered to pay $1 million to a Wells couple for a dispute over a transmission tower on their property.
Something Is Rotten in Denmark
Cell towers coming to Toronto Hydro Poles!
http://www.radio-canada.ca/emissions/medium_large/2013-2014/Excellente entrevue de Catherine Perrin ce matin qui sera rediffusée ce soir entre 21h et 23h et sur le Web
Jeudi le 12 déc, à l'émission de Catherine Perrin à la radio (Radio-Canada ici première, 95,1 à Mtl, Estrie à vérifier, 93,5 ou 101,7):: L'électrosensibilité, un vrai handicap ou un délire d'hypersensible?
Extreme Chemical Sensitivity Makes Sufferers Allergic to Life
Light bulb ban set to take effect
Safe Incandescent Bulbs to be Discontinued
Totonto Sun,
In January, officials will flip the switch on a year-long phase-out of the inefficient but cheap incandescent bulbs that have lit Canadian homes for generations.
New energy efficiency regulations would have also banned halogen incandescent bulbs, but Natural Resources officials now say they'll relax the standard so that those bulbs will survive the phase out.
That will leave consumers with an alternative to energy-saving compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs and LEDs.
While halogen incandescents suck up more power than CFLs and LEDs, they're still more efficient that traditional blubs.
And unlike CFLs, halogen incandescents don't contain mercury - a toxic substance can end up on carpets or hands and in the air if a bulb breaks.
Government officials admit Canadians worry about CFLs.
"Concerns have been raised by some Canadians and the media regarding CFLs, namely their mercury content, the method for their proper disposal, their perceived associated health effects and their performance," said officials in their regulatory analysis.
Natural Resources officials say they received almost 200 messages raising concerns about CFLs in July - around the time of two Sun Media editorials by columnist and Sun News Network host Brian Lilley.
Halogen incandescent bulbs aren't easy on the wallet, with a pack of two at one major Canadian retailer selling for $5.99.
That's cheaper than LEDs and about on par with CFLs.
You can buy four traditional bulbs, however, for $1.49.
To sign up for WEEP News: newssignup@weepinitiative.org (provide name and e-mail address)
W.E.E.P.  The Canadian initiative to stop: Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution
The Canadian initiative to stop Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution
11 December 2013
Keep kids off electromagnetic waves: DNA scientist
I would like to share with you the fight I led in order to   turn off Wi-Fi networks in 
My awareness to the subject was raised by a TV report on   channel 10, about WiFi in schools, at the start of October 2013.  This report caused me to check the   subject and understand that there is resistance to the subject in leading   research centers in the world. At the start, I checked 
I understood that   the Ministry of Education published inconclusive guidelines on purpose. On one   hand, the Ministry is trying to be seen as a body that takes care of the   children, and on the other hand, the Ministry leaves holes in its guidelines, in   order to put quickly the WiFi in maximum classrooms and to set facts before the   high court decision (that is expected during the next days).   !
At this stage, I approached Alon school's principal in   order to find out about the subject. I tried to understand if she was aware of   the risks. I emphasized, that I am not against progress, and that distributing   wired computers would enable progress without the unnecessary irradiation of the   children and school team. I explained also the differences between using a   router in your private house vs. in the classrooms:   
1) Inside the house each person can decide whether to use WiFi or not. The radiation is not imposed.
2) In the   house the option of wireless can be turned on in the router, and in all the   computers, only according to the need and not during all the time.   
3) In the house there are usually only 2-3 computers and   not 30-40 that look for the router (and more 30-40 cell phones and two   especially strong routers).
4) There is compulsory education law, this   law forces the children to be in schools 5-8 hours aday, they have nowhere to   run away. Again, forcing radiation on them.  
(it would be noted that the   feeling was, that in all her first responses, the school principal was guided by   
In her first response the principal referred me to the new executive form of the Ministry of Education, that was published after the last high court decision. She referred also to radiation measurements and periodical safety examinations, that are done by the municipality, and she tried to calm me down that she and the teaching team did not want to endanger themselves and that the computers carts are loaded only after the school day. I decided to check with my son and other children in his classroom, what happens in practice in the classrooms. I understood that there were two carts in each school (in each floor a cart for the classrooms on the same floor). One was in their classroom, serving 5th grade1, 6th grade1, 2 classrooms. The second was in the warehouse and serves 4th grade1, 2, and 5th grade2. It turned out that on their floor there was no warehouse, and so they put the cart inside my son's classroom and there the computers were loaded each time when the cart was returned to them (including when the children were in the class).
When I   continued to approach the school principal:
-  I raised the   problem of ignoring the loading procedure
- I tried to understand why they did not use wired internet   like the Ministry of Education guided (why was it not possible?)   
- I passed on information showing harm from non ionizing   radiation to the reproductive system (especially sperm quality), DNA breaks, BBB   penetration, EHS development, the classification of this radiation as 2B   carcinogen, and more. All of these dangers are much higher for children whose   brains are not developed yet, and in adolescents.  
- I passed on alternatives, including examples of   distribution of wired network and cost assessments.
In addition to this: 
I approached the parents of my son's classrooms, I informed   them on the subject and suggested that if the wireless networks were not stopped   in school, we would sign on non consent form against the participation of our   children in the classrooms and we would pass it on to the school principal.   
I wrote a very strong letter to several people responsible   for the issue in 
I wrote to the responsible in the Ministry of Education,   Mr. Noam Koriat (following his request though the school  principal)- manager of knowledge   management development and organization  from the Ministry of Education. His   response does not justify its description here. I found a parent representative   from Herzel school and we decided to cooperate together. I established a   facebook group on the subject of WiFi in 
 
I asked help from experts (Ram Dishon, Amir   Borenstein).
I got help from fights of parents in elementary schools in   Tel Aviv.
I worked with the Haifa Green Party, who raised the subject   of WiFi in 
There was a stage when I received phone calls from my son's   teacher and the school principal in attempt to calm me down, that there is no   danger in using WiFi and anyway the use is everywhere. A change happened when   the school principal informed 
1) there are no definitions of what is being checked. The   examinations are complicated and in practice are not done as they should be.   
2) the results are meaningless because the threshold   standard in 
They will not convince us and will not make us want   wireless internet networks in the schools where our children learn. Afterwards   the school principal sent me "Appendix 2, standards book for program   infrastructures" and drew my attention to the sentence "installing wired and   wireless networks in classrooms and public areas in schools" This is an older   version of the executive form, from 2010. 
At this stage I went again to the parents and to the   central parents committee chairman of the school. I updated in everything that   had happened and the fact that Wi-Fi use was stopped temporarily until the   radiation measurements.
I explained why it was not right to rely on the results   from this radiation measurement and that I was not ready to continue and   endanger my son for one more day. I called everyone to sign on non consent form   and to join the fight. I asked to understand the position of the central   committee (until now their voice is not heard). I suggested a meeting together   with parents from two other schools with experts. I was happy that this letter   was passed on by the central committee chairman to the school principal.  Then the school principal informed me   that a discussion was supposed to start soon in the municipality about using   wireless networks in all four schools in the project and that meanwhile the   pilot was stopped. A week afterwards (25/11  a one and a half month after   starting the fight), I was told by the school principal that it was decided in   Haifa municipality to stop using wireless networks in classrooms immediately in   the four schools where there is WiFi experiment.  
The digital books pilot will continue by downloading the   digital books to all wireless computers for one time, (with periodical updates).   The work near computers will be without using internet. Filing works will be   done by DOK. 
This solution is temporary until wired networks will be   installed gradually in all classrooms in all schools. Regarding downloading the   wireless computers, the school principal will make sure that it would be done   only after 17:00, before locking the classrooms and until the father of the   house comes early in the morning. In any case the download will not be done   while the pupils are inside the classrooms.
The principal thanked me from the bottom of her heart for   drawing her attention to the subject, because she was not aware of the danger,   and I thanked her for her openness to the subject, for her cooperation, for   implementing the precautionary principle and for putting the pupils health at   the top of the priorities. 
I hope this information will help parents and school   principals who are trying to make a change.  
Veronique Domshlak
http://www.tapuz.co.il/blog/net/ViewEntry.aspx?EntryId=2719381&skip=1
Iris
Genetic Fallacy: How Monsanto Silences Scientific Dissent
Video   2:14
Thank you for your email which has been circulated for information   to the Mayor, and Vancouver City Council.   
Bioelectric Signals Can Be Used to Detect Early Cancer
Peanut Allergies in Kids on the Rise
Allergies rise as the amount of electromagnetic radiation rises.To sign up for WEEP News: newssignup@weepinitiative.org (provide name and e-mail address)
W.E.E.P.  The Canadian initiative to stop: Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution