Monday, January 3, 2011

Where Have All the Bumble Bees Gone? / Don't Use Your Phone As An Alarm / Sage Associates Smart Meter Assessment / EMF Militancy? / Smart Energy / Strange Occurrences / TV



W.E.E.P. News
Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution News 
4 January 2011

Wildlife: Where Have All the Bumble Bees Gone?

http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2011/01/03/wildlife-where-have-all-the-bumble-bees-gone/
Posted by Bryan Walsh  Monday, January 3, 2011 

Scientists call it the Beepocalyspe. (OK, not scientists, but I like to call it that.) In late 2006, whole hives of honey bees began dying overnight for reasons that are still unclear. Scientists called it colony-collapse disorder (CCD), and it's as scary as it is mysterious. Adult bees simply leave the hive, ostensibly in search of pollen, only to die somewhere in the open. Reported death rates in bee colonies in the U.S. were 29% in 2009 and rose to 34% in 2010. (Data from the Department of Agriculture's CCD Progress Report—download a PDF here.) It's still unclear what's behind CCD—recent studies have suggested that it might be due to a combination of viral and fungal infections—but there's no doubt about the impact that sustained bee loss would have on the agricultural sector. About 130 crops in the U.S.—worth some $15 billion a year—depend on pollination from the honeybee alone in the U.S., and it's scary to think what might happen to the world food supply if CCD can't be curbed.
Get ready for more bad news—it's not just the honeybees that are disappearing. North American bumble bees have been steadily dwindling, vanishing from their long-established habitat. Bumble bees aren't as well-known as honeybees, but they're important pollinators as well, especially for tomatoes and berries. While there have been anecdotal reports from beekeepers and other observers about population declines for bumblebees, however there hasn't been the same concerted effort to track bumble bees. But a new paper published in the January 3 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) contains the results of a multiyear study of bumble bee populations, and the numbers are sobering. According to the study, written by a team of scientists including entomologist Sydney Cameron of the University of Illinois, the relative abundance of four species of bumble bees over the past few decades has dropped by more than 90%—and those disappearing species are also suffering from low genetic diversity, which makes them that much more susceptible to disease or any other environmental pressures. (Download a PDF of the paper here.)
As with CCD, it's not clear why bumble bee populations seem to be declining. Cameron and her colleagues note the possible role of a parasite called Nosema bombi that commonly found in Europe but which hasn't been fully studied among North American bumble bees. It's not a smoking gun, but the PNAS paper found that declining populations of bumble bee species were associated with high levels of parasite infection, while stable species were less likely to show frequent infection. Still, the authors write that the parasite could simply be more common in species that are declining—correlative, rather than causative.
Indeed, while studies like this one can help us get a grip on the problem of declining species, it's still not clear what's causing it—which makes the vanishing that much more eerie. On a day when authorities are trying to figure out why thousands of birds fell from the sky and thousands of fish died in the rivers in Arkansas, the bee study is a reminder of all the ways we may be impacting the natural world for the worse—without even knowing it.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Health:  Don't Use Your Phone As An Alarm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment of Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation
Emissions from Smart Meters
Sage Reports
Notice of Availability

Sage Associates has published an on-line report titled Assessment of Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation
Emissions from Smart Meters, dated January 1, 2011.  


The Report is available for download at:


About the Report (from the website)
This Report is prepared in support of open discussion on radiofrequency microwave radiation levels (RF radiation levels) that are produced by wireless electric meters (i.e., smart meters) in California. There has been virtually no information made available to the public, nor to decision-makers on RF radiation levels. Significant unanswered questions still exist about what levels of radiofrequency microwave radiation will be produced by these meters.
This question has very important consequences for public health and welfare, because the public may be subjected to exposures at levels that either violate federal safety limits, or face chronic exposure levels that have already been associated with adverse health impacts, or both.
This Report uses computer modeling to predict power density levels that may be present where smart meters are in operation. The methodology used in this assessment is consistent with FCC OET 65 equations for prediction of RF power density levels. Many scenarios are modeled, to bracket the range of reasonably predictable RF exposures in typical living conditions. Many variables must be considered (installation very close to occupied space, how many meters are installed on a single wall, how frequently they will transmit an RF pulse, how powerful the RF radiation pulses will be, how far inside a home they will penetrate and at what intensities, how much 'piggybacking' of RF signals will occur from neighboring wireless meters, reflections that may increase RF levels, and what amount of RF wireless exposure may already be present beforehand, etc.)
To date, California's electric utilities have told the California Public Utilities Commission only that they will comply with applicable federal safety limits.  However, there are substantial discrepancies in what the FCC compliance testing says is needed for wireless meters to comply with their safety limits, and the manner in which many meters are being installed and are operating.
People may use this assessment to further their knowledge about wireless meters, using the tables that predict RF radiation levels, the tables that highlight potential violations of safety limits, and the health study-related tables showing RF radiation levels reported to pose health impacts. Although the authors expect there will be differences of opinion about the content of this report, we believe it will provide a basis for more educated decision-making and full disclosure of impacts.
The Report is not intended to be a substitute for disclosure of RF radiation levels by the CPUC and the electric utilities it regulates. They are responsible to the public to provide reliable and comprehensive information on impacts from wireless meters.
Cindy Sage
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Arrests of Smart Meter Protesters in U.S. Made Today in Marin Co., California
Should the Wireless Sector be Concerned with Increasing EMF Militancy ?
www.stimulatingbroadband.com/2010/12/first-arrests-of-smart-meter-protesters.html
Iris
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Smart Energy Canada 2011 conference and exhibition
http://www.smartenergy-canada.com/web-files/pdf/SEC%20brochure.pdf
http://www.smartenergy-canada.com/en/index.php
See how they have 'made' a multi billion dollar industry by selling dangerous meters to gullible people

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following Strange Occurrences all appeared on The Drudge Report on the same day:

Have scientists discovered how to create downpours in the desert?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1343470/Have-scientists-discovered-create-downpours-desert.html

Dead fish cover 20-miles of Arkansas River...
http://www.todaysthv.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=136401&catid=2

Blackbirds falling in the dead of night: Investigation under way after
1,000 tumble from Arkansas sky
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1343605/1-000-blackbirds-fall-Arkansas-sky-New-Years-Eve.html

Residents in Leixlip, Co. Kildare have reported large numbers of birds falling dead to the ground.

Kind regards,

John Weigel
Leixlip
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Warning: Could your TV be ruining your health?

By Mrs Green

EMFs have been linked with miscarriages, birth defects, various cancers (particularly childhood leukaemia), chronic fatigue, headaches, stress, nausea and heart problems as well as other health conditions

http://littlegreenblog.com/green-home/environment-issues/warning-could-your-tv-be-ruining-your-health/
David



To sign up for WEEP News: http://www.blogger.com/  (provide name and e-mail address)
W.E.E.P. – The Canadian initiative to stop Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution
Posted by
Reactions: 

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Its official now: Radiation from your cell phone may be killing you / Birds fall from the sky / Powerwatch Science Update / Leukemia....Molly Campbell....one month / Top New Year's resolutions


W.E.E.P. News
Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution News 
3 January 2011

Its official now: Radiation from your cell phone may be killing you

Published: Sunday, Jan 2, 2011, 17:36 IST
By Priya Adhyaru Majithia | Place: Ahmedabad | Agency: DNA
Daily News and Analysis 
After many years of debate over the health hazards posed by mobile phones, a recent report finally establishes it.
The exhaustive report has been submitted recently to the Department of Telecom by Prof Girish Kumar of IIT-Bombay's department of electrical engineering.
Kumar, who has done extensive research on cell phone radiation and its effects warns against excessive use of cell phones as they put users, to increased risk of cancer, brain tumour and many other health hazards. More so in case of children.
The major health hazards of radiation from cell phones and cell towers are as given below:
_A 400% increase in the risk of brain cancer among for teenagers using cell phones. Children are more vulnerable to cell phone radiation. The younger the child, the deeper is the penetration of electromagnetic radiation as children's skulls are thinner.
_Excessive use of mobile phones can also cause cancer in anyone. Use of cell phones for more than 30 minutes per day for 10 years increases the risk of brain cancer and acoustic neuroma.
_Cell phone radiation causes irreversible damage to male fertility. Studies have found 30% lower sperm count in intensive users of mobile phones.
_Cell phone frequencies can cause damage to the DNA of the body's cells. Radiation causes 'free radical formation' inside the body's cells; the free radicals are known to be carcinogenic.
_Cell phone frequencies interfere with the functioning of other life-saving gadgets, including implanted pace-makers, and may, therefore, cause sudden death.
_Mobile phone exposure can activate the stress response in human and animal cells which causes production of stress proteins. This is proof enough that the body recognises radiations from cell phones as potentially harmful.
_Electromagnetic fields caused by cell phone and cell tower radiation degrade the immune system and stimulate allergic\inflammatory responses, including rashes, sores, biting sensations and lesions.
_People using cell phones for more than 30 minutes a day for more than four years are at a higher risk of hearing loss. Cell phone radiation can cause tinnitus and damage the auditory hair cells present in the inner ear. Once damaged, these cells can never regenerate.
_Frequent use of mobile phones can also damage the visual system in many ways. Cell phone frequencies (900, 1800 MHz and 2450 MHz) damage epithelial cells and increase the temperature within the eye.
_Cell phone emissions weaken bones and can cause reduction in melatonin (a type of antioxidant which is immune system enhancer) levels.
_An increased risk of salivary gland cancer is linked to the use of mobile phones.
_Exposure to electromagnetic fields can cause sleep disorders and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.
_Due to consistent electromagnetic background noise, bees and birds become disoriented and cannot return to their hives and nests. It has adverse effects on animals, plants and the environment
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thousands of birds fall from the sky in Beebe
Thanks go to several contributors who sent me this story.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powerwatch
December 2010 - Science Update
The following is a quick summary of another twenty papers that have come out over the last few months related to effects of electromagnetic radiation. Some of the papers are notable papers that have been published very recently, others are papers that were published a few months ago that have not yet made it to one of the Science Updates
Click here for the full news story  http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20101227-science-update.asp

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject:    Leukemia....Molly Campbell....one month. dx...12-25-10
To All    -      If anyone needs "motivation" re the need to inform re "preventable health problems in 2011," the tragic story of infant, Molly, and what her entire family must endure for at least one year, is "powerful!"     
While Molly's blog does not, of course, mention likely close electric field exposure(s) as "causal," we do know cancer does not take decades to develop, that major cause of Leukemia is radiation, and that known blood changes re close electric field exposures and ionizing radiation treatments, etc., are "identical" and "pre-Leukemic!"    See my website:   http://www.guineapigsrus.org/    ........
Best wishes for 2011 and take care!      Joanne

 

Stephanie Rink Molly is 1 month old and was diagnosed with Leukemia on Christmas eve. Please show your support by going to www.molly-campbell.com and if you can help the family with a donation, im sure they would be forever greatful.

I have also started a facebook group, for Molly : http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_182163698...468338

I made my profile picture for Molly aswell, to help raise awareness about this precious baby, please save the picture and make it your own profile picture to help Molly and her family. Together we can help Molly be heard.

 

This is so sad.
Infant leukemia (<12 months) is almost universally believed to be initiated at conception or in-utero. It is likely to have been some sort of damage to the father's sperm, or exposure to Rebekah during pregnancy or probably just one of those perchance genetic errors than can happen everytime we create new life. In my opinion it is almost certainly nothing to do with Molly's environment in the 28 days after birth.
Such cases do raise very difficult ethical issues. They have a devastatingly disruptive effect on the life of the family. Early remission of symptoms is common and things look hopeful but, unlike ALL cases diagnosed later, say at 2 - 5 years old, where the  5-year survival rate is now for cALL is now around 90%, it is still only about an overall 33% 5-year rate for children diagnosed with ALL under 1 year in age, much lower for some variants of leukemia. They often relapse or develop other leukemias or cancers. Many, if they survive, end up infertile or with other long-term problems.
I see the Molly website states: "However, Molly's leukemia has the genetic markers of a much more difficult leukemia to treat." With modern genetic testing techniques it is becoming possible to grade the likelihood of an eventual 5 year plus disease-free survival period. When that is likely to be less than, say, a 10% chance, the question "to treat or not to treat" should be asked.
What is the fairest way forward for Molly, especially for her siblings and, in the long-term, her parents?  Doctors must be very honest with such parents and the parents need to pray to their God and carefully consider the lives of their other children.
I am lucky that I have never been placed in such a position. I raise this difficult issue as with modern healthcare and genetic and other analysis techniques long-term prognoses are becoming far more accurate.  Of course Molly matters - but so do all the members of her family - each just as much as each other.
Blessings to you all
Alasdair
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top New Year's resolutions
Text less -- Texting and cell phone use is becoming an addiction for many young people. According to a study done by Case Western Reserve School of Medicine in Cleveland of 4,257 secondary school students, almost one in five teens sent more than 120 texts a day.
David



To sign up for WEEP News: http://www.blogger.com/  (provide name and e-mail address)
W.E.E.P. – The Canadian initiative to stop Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution

Posted by
Reactions: 
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)