Tuesday, November 9, 2010

The real truth on why cancer has advanced / Coast to Coast Radio / FALSIFYING HIS IDENTITY / But Are They Safe? / low frequency electric and magnetic fields / Laptops and sperm quality

W.E.E.P. News

Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution News

9 November 2010

Dr. Devra Davis is giving a public lecture in Peterborough, ON, on Tuesday November 23, 2010 entitled:

The Secret History of the WAR on Cancer
The real truth on why cancer has advanced in our society

Dr. Devra Davis

Tuesday, November 23, 2010 7:30 p.m.

Showplace Performance Centre

290 George St. North, Peterborough

This is a free, ticketed event, open to the public. School groups welcome.

To order tickets, please reserve online at

www.trentu.ca/sheperd

Seating in the theatre is on a first-come, first-served basis. Book signing, book sale and refreshments following lecture. For further information, please call 748-1011 x 6025

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coast to Coast A.M. Radio Show

Tuesday November 9, 2010

Author and health pioneer Ann Louise Gittleman will discuss the latest scientific data and case studies that show how EMF pollution has reached the point of toxicity, causing fatigue, irritability, weakness, and even illness, and how we can protect ourselves from the danger.

Her website is at

http://www.areyouzapped.com/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Joshua Hart, Stop Smart Meters! (831) 440 9814

November 8th 2010 joshuanoahhart@gmail.com

DIRECTOR OF PG&E'S SMART METER PROGRAM CAUGHT FALSIFYING HIS IDENTITY

William Devereaux Infiltrated Health Advocacy Group in Order to Gather Intelligence

San Francisco- William Devereaux, Senior Director of Pacific Gas and Electric's 'Smart' Meter program has been caught falsifying his identity in a covert attempt to access information from a group of citizens opposing the new meters. The group has been identifying and collecting evidence of widespread health problems, meter inaccuracies, electrical interference and customer information privacy problems caused by PG&E's wireless 'Smart' Meters.

Devereaux, who has testified to numerous local governments throughout California and made claims about the meters' safety and accuracy, has been using a fake name on other activist listservs for months. This may explain how PG&E contractors Wellington Energy knew to evacuate their installation yard in Rohnert Park before a protest planned by neighborhood groups on October 28th. But on Thursday, November 4, Devereaux pushed his luck and was caught lying about his own identity and hiding his position with PG&E. Apparently assuming that his name would be hidden, Devereaux signed his e-mail to Sandi Maurer, moderator of the EMF Safety Coalition, "Ralph." However, his e-mail program revealed the sender's true identity:

On Nov 4, 2010, at 3:23 PM, William Devereaux <manasota99@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sandi,

> Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I've been travelling a lot. I live in Oakland where Smart >meters have been sweeping across town and wanted to learn more about them and join the conversation to >see what I can do to help out here.

> Thanks,

> Ralph

"This is not a single indiscretion, but rather typical of the false information that PG&E has publicized, fabricating advantages for customers." said Ellen Marks of the Environmental Health Trust. "Contrary to PG&E claims, we will face significantly increased utility bills, collection of private data revealing information about events occurring inside our home, and exposure to powerful spikes of microwave radiation 24 hours a day through our brains and bodies."

The deception by one of PG&E's top officials is only the latest in a series of unethical tactics used to force 'Smart' Meters on an increasingly skeptical public. PG&E has been ripping off 'do not install signs' on meters, and threatening to cut off the gas and electricity supply to elderly residents of Santa Rosa- even as winter approaches- unless they accept a 'Smart' Meter. The company has also censored public comments on its Facebook page, deleting references to peer-reviewed scientific studies showing health damage from RadioFrequency (RF) radiation at levels far below those from the 'Smart' Meter.

PG&E's meter program represents the largest system technology roll out in the history of California, yet they have not even done a basic Environmental Impact Report, which could have caught the massive violations of health, privacy invasion and increased costs to customers. The meters have been plagued with problems since the beginning, starting with widespread reports of inflated bills, privacy violations, electrical interference and reports of health issues from residents who have received the new meters. 'Smart' Meters use microwave radiation (similar to a cell phone) to transmit customer data back to the utility, and are being installed just as the public learns of evidence that brain tumors and other health damage can be traced to similar wireless devices. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) which sanctioned PG&E's $2.2 billion program to install 10 million new meters throughout California at the expense of ratepayers, has not allowed individuals to opt out even in cases of severe health impacts.

Nearly two dozen local governments* have called for a moratorium. The State's Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) last month also demanded public hearings be held to study potential health risks resulting from exposure to radiation from the meters.

According to Joshua Hart of Stop Smart Meters!, "This fraud and covert espionage against the people of California, carried out by the Director of the 'Smart' Meter Program in California, should immediately force a moratorium on 'Smart' Meter installation and open up a full independent State Legislative investigation of the entire PG&E 'Smart' Meter Program."

<end>

* California local governments demanding a moratorium include: the City and County of San Francisco, Santa Cruz and Marin Counties, Sonoma County Supervisor Efren Carrillo, the cities of Sebastopol, Berkeley, Cotati, Fairfax, Santa Cruz, Piedmont, Scotts Valley, Capitola, Watsonville, Sausalito, San Anselmo, Belvedere, Monte Sereno, Novato, Richmond, Ross, Bolinas, and Camp Meeker

Stop Smart Meters!

http://stopsmartmeters.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Smart Meters - They're Smart, But Are They Safe?

November 8, 2010

http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/16846-1

SAN FRANCISCO - PG&E's Smart Meters may be smart, but some Californians say they're making them sick. Nearly two dozen communities have placed moratoriums on the wireless utility meters, and more than 2,000 health-related complaints have been received by the California Public Utilities Commission.

Elizabeth Kelley, founder of the Electromagnetic Safety Alliance, says the wireless meters are invasive and involuntary, so people should be able to opt-out of the program.
"Because we don't know yet what the health risks are from these low-powered frequencies that are eventually going to be traveling through our home night and day emitting pulse radio frequency radiation, this is causing considerable concern."

Kelley says especially for people who suffer from electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS).

PG&E contends its meters comply with federal safety standards and are well within what you would find with normal household appliances.

Kelley says more research should have been done before the devices were put in people's homes.

"There are no specific studies on Smart Meters, but there are comparable studies on very low power non-ionizing radiation exposure conditions, namely cellular antennas, which show there can be harm under certain exposure conditions."

Olle Johansson is a professor in the department of neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden. He's collaborating with leading international scientists on a proposal recommending global governments adopt new, more stringent, exposure guidelines for wireless technologies.

"We have looked upon the current literature in the science field and it's obvious that the current guidelines for public exposure are definitely obsolete and need to be replaced by biologically based guidelines, taking into account various forms of health effects."

In July, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to require warning labels on cell phones and education on risks at the point of sale.

A program on wireless hazards Wednesday at the San Francisco Library will feature leading activists addressing concerns about Smart Meters, cell phones and cell towers, followed by a screening of the documentary, "Full Signal."

A Nov. 18 program at the Commonwealth Club will include leading international scientists addressing health issues related to a variety of wireless technologies.

More information is available at

http://electromagnetichealth.org.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The biological effects of low frequency electric and magnetic fields

November 8, 2010.

Most of the documents in Zory's Archive are concerned with the biological effects of radio frequency radiation. This week we have one that focuses on the biological effects of low frequency electric and magnetic fields.

Nair, I, MG Morgan, and HK Florig. 1989. Biological Effects of Power Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields, Background paper as part of OTA's assessment of Electric Power Wheeling and Dealing: 

Technological Considerations for Increasing Competition, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, Congress of the United States, Office of Technology Assessment, 110 pp.

Introduction and Overview

Electric and magnetic fields produced by electric power systems have recently been added to the list of environmental agents that are a potential threat to public health.

This paper describes peoples' exposures to fields from power systems and other sources (Section 2), reviews existing scientific evidence on the biological effects of these fields (Sections 3 through 7), presents a history of research support and of regulatory activity (Sections 8 and 9 ), and discusses problems and alternatives in regulatory action (Section 10).

For more information, visit: 

http://www.magdahavas.com/2010/11/08/pick-of-the-week-17-power-frequency-electromagnetic-fields/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Laptop use on laps might reduce sperm quality: report

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6A70G720101108

Sun, Nov 7 2010

NEW YORK (Reuters Life!) - Using a laptop computer as the name suggests may not be good for male reproductive health, according to a study.

And there is little that can be done about it, aside from using the laptop on a desk, said Yelim Sheynkin, a urologist at the State University of New York at Stony Brook who led the study published in Fertility and Sterility.

In the study, thermometers were used to measure the temperature of the scrotums of 29 young men balancing a laptop on their knees. Even with a lap pad under the computer, the men's scrotums overheated quickly.

"Millions and millions of men are using laptops now, especially those in the reproductive age range," said Sheynkin.

"Within 10 or 15 minutes their scrotal temperature is already above what we consider safe, but they don't feel it."

According to the American Urological Association, nearly one in six couples in the United States have trouble conceiving. About half the time this is due to male infertility.

Under normal circumstances, the position of the testicles outside the body keeps them a few degrees cooler than the inside of the body, which is necessary for sperm production.

No studies have yet researched how laptops affect male fertility and there is no strong evidence that it would, Sheynkin added. But earlier research has showed that warming the scrotum even more than one degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) is enough to damage sperm.

Though both general health and lifestyle factors such as nutrition and drug use can affect reproductive health, tight jeans and briefs are generally not considered a risk factor since people are moving around.

Holding a laptop on the knees, though, requires keeping the legs still and closed. After one hour in this position, the researchers found that the men's testicle temperature had risen by up to 2.5 C.

A lap pad kept the computer cool and meant that less heat was transmitted to the skin, but Sheynkin warned it didn't do much to cool the testicles and might give a false sense of security.

"I wouldn't say that if someone starts to use laptops they will become infertile," Sheynkin told Reuters Health, though he warned that frequent use might contribute to reproductive problems because "the scrotum doesn't have time to cool down."

When the men sat with their legs spread wide -- made possible only by placing the computer on a large lap pad -- they could keep their testicles cooler. But it still took less than 30 minutes before they began overheating.

"No matter what you do, even with the legs spread wide apart, the temperature is still going to be higher than what we call safe," said Sheynkin.

Web site www.weepinitiative.org e-mail contactweep@weepinitiative.org

To sign up for WEEP News: newssignup@weepinitiative.org  (provide name and e-mail address)

W.E.E.P. – The Canadian initiative to stop Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution

Monday, November 8, 2010

Safety Code 6 and the Safety of WiFi in Schools - Letter to HESA Committee

W.E.E.P. News

Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution News

8 November 2010

To: Carrie.C@parl.gc.ca ; Hughes.C@parl.gc.ca ; dhallr@parl.gc.ca ; Murray.J@parl.gc.ca ; Smith.J@parl.gc.ca ; MaloL@parl.gc.ca ; Leslie.M@parl.gc.ca ; Dufour.N@parl.gc.ca ; Davidson.P@parl.gc.ca ; BrownPa@parl.gc.ca ; Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca ; Uppal.T@parl.gc.ca ; Dosanjh.u@parl.gc.ca

Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 7:39 PM

Subject: [Bulk] Safety Code 6 and the Safety of WiFi in Schools - Letter to HESA Committee

Dear Members of the HESA Standing Committee on Health,

Please find attached my submission on the above-noted subject.

Sincerely,

Malini Menon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Whales found dead on Donegal beach

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-11705622

By Nuala McCann BBC News
7 November 2010

Scientists examine the remains of the whales on Rutland Island Environmentalists are trying to establish how 33 whales beached and died off the coast of County Donegal.

They were found on Rutland Island near Burtonport on Saturday.

It's thought they were the same group spotted in the Inner Hebrides at the end of October.

Dr Simon Berrow of the Irish Whale and Dolphin Group said it was one of the biggest mass deaths of whales in Irish history.

He is concerned that Royal Navy sonar equipment could have played a role.

"Thirty or 40 pilot whales were spotted off the Inner Hebrides at South Uist last week," he said.

"It looked like they were going to strand. It was bad weather. They were not seen again."

Dr Berrow said the Royal Navy had been in the area off South Uist and had moved away.

Campaigners were concerned that the latest sonar equipment could have disturbed the navagational skills of this deep diving species of whales.

But a spokeswoman from the Royal Navy said that when the whales were spotted near South Uist, the closest navy ship was 50 miles away.

At that distance, she said, there was no way that the sonar equipment could have affected them.

In the past, the navy has denied that sonar noise from their warships could cause whales to beach.

However, in America, the US Navy was ordered not to use mid-frequency sonar during training exercises from 2007 and 2009, after a judge found in favour of campaigners who argued the devices harmed marine mammals in the area.

A team from Galway/Mayo Institute of Technology travelled to the scene off Donegal at the weekend to see if they could determine what had happened.

Sixty whales died in the 1960s off the west coast of Kerry and 35 to 40 animals died in north Kerry in 2001.

Margaret

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Important review on biological effects of antennas by Levitt and Lai 2010

Posted by inthesenewtimes on November 7, 2010  Magda Havas

http://inthesenewtimes.com/2010/11/07/important-review-on-biological-effects-of-antennas-by-levitt-and-lai-2010/

Important review of the biological effects for those living near antennas was just published in Environmental Reviews, a Journal of the Canadian National Research Council.

Levitt, BB and H. Lai.  2010. Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays.  Environmental Reviews 18:369-395.

This paper written by Blake Levitt, an award winning medical science writer, and Dr. Henry Lai at the University of Washington, one of the first scientist along with his colleague Dr. Singh to document DNA damage attributed to cell phone radiation, follows on the heals of a Private Member's Bill introduced to the Ontario Legislative Assemble by NDP Health Critic, France Gelinas, asking thatwarning labels be posted on cell phones.

Cell phones communicate with cell phone antennas and both devices emit radiation. One you hold to your head or ideally away from your head.  The other may be near your home or on top of your or a neighbouring apartment building sending out microwave radiation each time someone nearby  uses a cell phone.

The scientific consensus is that the more you are exposed to this radiation, the greater the potential for damaging effects even at levels well below existing federal guidelines.  Indeed, many scientists believe that there is no "safe" level for microwave radiation.

The mobile phone studies are showing an increased risk of both benign and malignant tumors on the same side of your head that you hold to the cell (or cordless) phone appearing after 10 years of moderate use.

The cell phone antenna studies are showing that people who live within 400 meters of these antennas experience an increased risk of cancer and symptoms associated with electrical hypersensitivity.

According to Levitt and Lai their review includes "Both anecdotal reports and some epidemiology studies have found headaches, skin rashes, sleep disturbances, depression, decreased libido, increased rates of suicide, concentration problems, dizziness, memory changes, increased risk of cancer, tremors, and other neurophysiological effects in populations near base stations."  These symptoms decrease or disappear when the transmitters are turned off (for repair), when people shield their homes from the radiation, or when they leave their immediate environment and are not exposed to this radiation.

Whether the issue is WiFi in schools, cell phone use, or living near cell phones antennas  . . . in all cases people are exposed to microwave radiation.  This radiation is similar to what is emitted by microwave ovens.  The major difference is that the radiation in the microwave oven is supposed to be contained whereas the radiation from all these other devices is not contained.  Indeed it if were contained the devices would not work.

What happens if you put metal into a microwave oven?  It sparks as it reflects the microwave radiation. The same thing happens in your home.  Metal objects reflect this radiation and can produce hotspot.

So the classroom with the WiFi base station and the bedroom with the cell phone antenna nearby become the microwave ovens with the radiation set on low power.

In years to come we will marvel at our stupidity for holding microwave transmitters to our head and installing WiFi base stations in kindergartens and elementary classrooms and placing laptop computers on our lap connecting wirelessly to the internet.  Just as we marvel at using X-rays to fit children's shoes, or allowing baby power containing asbestos to be sold, or spraying DDT from airplanes over both urban and rural communities with children playing outside we will marvel at our stupidity for using microwave radiation in such a frivolous manner for such a minor convenience.

Levitt and Lai correctly state that "Non- ionizing electromagnetic fields are among the fastest growing forms of environmental pollution."  Non-ionizing electromagnetic fields refers to microwaves (WiFi, Wi-Max, mobile phones and mobile phone antennas, as well as radar and other wireless devices that emit between 300 MHz and 300 GHz), radio frequency radiation generated by radio and television broadcast antennas (1 kHz to 300 MHz) and extremely low frequency radiation (below 1 kHz) from electrical wires and appliances.

Despite this we have virtually no research funding to study the effects of this radiation in North America, in part, because Health Canada and the Federal Communication Commission have established guidelines based on a thermal effect with the flawed assumption that the ONLY effect is one of heating despite thousands of scientific documents reporting biological and health effects at levels thousands of times below these thermal guidelines!

So we now have a Canadian NRC journal publishing this important paper on the biological effects of living near antennas; we have a Private Member's Bill in front of the Ontario Legislative Assemble asking that cell phones carry a warning label; we have HESA Committee hearings on this topic with the first inApr 27 and 29, 2010 and the most recent hearing October 28, 2010; we have mayors in several communities from British Columbia to Newfoundland asking that a month be set aside for ElectroHypersSensitivity Awareness; and we have major media CBC, Global TV, as well as radio stations, newspapers, and magazines across the country covering this important topic.  Our recent paperon how radiation from a cordless phone affects the heart just came out last week in a book called "Non-thermal Effects and Mechanisms of Interaction between Electromagnetic Fields and Living Matter " (more on that soon).

What more will it take for Health Canada to admit there is a problem and that the current guidelines we have do not protect the public?  How many people will continue to suffer and how many children will have to die before Health Canada and the Medical Officer of Health in Ontario and in other provinces will admit they are wrong!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This article doesn't mention the added risk from cell phone use but does state that there are about 4.9 billion mobile phone "connections" every month.

Airline frequency fliers face radiation risk from space solar flare activity

by Andrew Hough

The Daily Telegraph (U.K.)

November 5, 2010

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/8102629/Airline-frequent-fliers-radiation-poisoning-risks-from-space-solar-flare-storm-activity.html

Researchers found passengers faced the "hazard" of space radiation, which created unhealthy levels of exposure while flying at "typical cruise altitudes" of 40,000 feet.

Experts warned passengers could be subjected to increasing risk to cancer due to such radiation levels.

Nasa scientists believe the earth is facing danger from a once-in-a-century "solar flare", a disturbance on the Sun's surface that could cause geomagnetic storms on this planet.

One in the mid-19th century blocked the nascent telegraph system and many scientists believe another is overdue.

Researchers from the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxon, warned that the electrical grid, computers, telephones, transportation, water supply and food production faced "huge disturbances" from space storms.

Their vulnerability is also blamed on humans' "creeping dependency" on modern technology. For example there are about 4.9 billion mobile phone "connections" every month.

Scientists found aircrew were "the major occupation group" most exposed to the Sun's radiation with passengers also at risk from the phenomenon.

Because the sun's radiation levels had been reasonably low for the past century, its strengthening power in the coming few years would create new health problems.

"Space radiation is a hazard not only to the operation of modern aircraft but also to the health of aircrew and passengers," said the study, titled Space weather and its impact on Earth – implications for business.

"Radiation from space can reach the Earth's atmosphere and create extra radiation exposure for people travelling on aircraft at typical cruise altitudes (40,000 feet).

"The radiation risk to passengers is usually much less than that for aircrew since most passenger spend less time in the air (and) the radiation doses accumulate with time in flight, especially at cruise altitudes."

The study, published by Lloyds of London, the insurance market, added: "However, frequent fliers whose time in the air approaches that of aircrew are equally at risk. There is, as yet, no legal framework for handling such risks."

During one "major space weather event", in October 2003, the FAA issued a formal warned that all routes north and south of 35 degree latitude "were subject to excessive radiation doses" and the researchers said further airline disruption was almost certain.

In 1990 such health risks to aircrew were recognised by the International Commission on Radiological Protection with EU-based aircrew classified as radiation workers in 2000. Most airlines now monitor levels during safety assessments.

Prof Mike Hapgood, the head of the Laboratory's Space Environment Group, who led the study, told The Daily Telegraph that a person flying from London to the US West Coast would receive extra radiation levels to that given from an chest x-ray, which is fairly low.

But Prof Hapgood, who will give evidence to MPs next week, said that during a big solar storm radiation levels would sharply spike, with a passenger on a long haul flight being exposed to the equivalent of dozens of x-rays at once.

"There is an increased risk of cancer," said Prof Hapgood, who undertakes scientific research into "near-Earth space" activity.

"People would be sensible to think about kind of work they do, how much flying they do and what risk that poses. I don't think that is unreasonable."

The Lloyds study urged business to "plan accordingly" and develop safeguards against the event.

The researchers found "vulnerable" and unprepared British firms could be hit with "widespread disruption".

Between five and 10 per cent of critical infrastructure is government owned and business understanding on the subject was "patchy", which left many facing uncertainty.

A power grid or satellite breakdown would leave a multi-million pound cost to the economy as solar flares trigger "cascading failures across systems".

"Because space weather affects major global systems… a very severe outbreak presents a systematic risk," the report said.

The Daily Telegraph disclosed in September that ministers fear the electricity grid, financial networks and transport infrastructure could be paralysed by a solar flare or a nuclear attack.

Such an event would be similar to the recent volcanic ash cloud disruption to airline travel or the chaos caused by the recent bouts of snowy weather, which left a multi-billion pound bill to firms.

The researchers cited a Quebec power grid failure in 1989 which, following a magnetic storm, caused it to shutdown, leaving five million people without electricity during the winter for more than nine hours and left a damage bill of more than C$2billion (£1.23 billion).

Lavone

Web site www.weepinitiative.org e-mail contactweep@weepinitiative.org

To sign up for WEEP News: newssignup@weepinitiative.org  (provide name and e-mail address)

W.E.E.P. – The Canadian initiative to stop Wireless Electrical and Electromagnetic Pollution